The Last Planner System (LPS) is a production planning system designed to improve predictability while maximizing efficiency and safety. The system was developed by Glenn Ballard and Greg Howell and has grown to become one of the cornerstones of Lean Construction. Simply put, LPS is exactly what its name suggests, a system that engages last planners—the people ultimately responsible for getting the work done—in the planning and efficient execution of a project.
The Last Planner System Conference will help you gain an in-depth insight into the practical application of the Last Planner System. You will learn about the different elements related to LPS and how they can improve communication, trust, transparency and reliability. You will also learn how LPS can help you meet project deadlines and cost targets with real-life examples and hands-on tips that you can start applying the next day.
The conference is hosted over 2 days, with over 25 industry experts and 20 sessions.
The Last Planner System Conference is suited for everyone working in the AEC industry from owners and project executives to trade partners and superintendents working at any stage of a project from design through construction. Here are some of the reasons for why you should attend:
The Last Planner System Conference will offer several great opportunities for sponsors and exhibitors. If you are interested in sponsoring or exhibiting at our upcoming conference, please review our sponsors kit or reach out to us directly.
Why Sponsor/Exhibit:
Learn from internationally renowned Lean Construction professionals
Work on what became known as the Last Planner System began in 1980 as a concerted effort by a handful of people drawing on their own observations in the field and from productivity work being done in other industries to test and learn more effective practices for construction. In this session, Tom will share the story of the LPS, how it was developed and the philosophy that informs it.
Tom RichertThe LPS is a holistic system, meaning that each of its parts is necessary to support lean project planning and execution. Resist the temptation to treat the system as a menu from which you select only the parts you want to use. In this session, Rich will go over the five core components of the LPS and explain how they are all connected. He will also explore how these components support the 4 levels of the Last Planner System: Should, Can, Will and Did.
RICH SEILERThe Last Planner System is just that, a system, with different elements, that when performed together properly create a reliable workflow on any project. One of those elements is often mistakenly discussed as being synonymous with the entire system itself: Pull Planning. In this session, Dan and Andy will discuss what is pull planning and share some hard and fast rules for conducting a successful pull planning session that suits your specific project and team’s needs.
DAN FAUCHIER & ANDY FULTONIn this session, Christian will discuss the importance of production management and productivity improvement aspects, especially in the tight labor markets we are experiencing everywhere, and how your approach to LPS can have a more positive impact. He will also examine the roles and responsibilities of the various parties to the project to ensure the last planners are being set up for success.
CHRISTIAN PIKELThe journey to establishing the LPS on a project does not happen instantly. After you create your pull plan, variation will occur. Your attitude and how you react to that variation impacts that journey. In this session, you will discover where to focus your attention and when and how to adjust your plan based on the variation you are experiencing across the different levels of the LPS.
COLIN MILBERGRolling out any transformation programme from a pilot is a challenge. This is particularly challenging as you start to deal with multiple different cultures and norms that define certain behaviors and communication styles. In this session, we explore some of the “plusses” and “deltas” we have found as we have rolled out the LPS transformations from Alaska to Zambia and most places in-between.
CARLOS MENDES & EDWARD ZAAYMANSince 2005, Brad and Erika have applied the Last Planner System on over 20 projects. In this session, they will share their journey from the early phases of using the LPS, to the early evolution of their practice, and share the challenges that they have faced along the way.
BRAD MARSHALL & ERIKA BYSEMany teams have tried the LPS without seeing the results they hear about from others. Surprisingly to some, the tactical pieces of the system alone can only do so much. Without creating a culture of psychological safety, along with a culture of accountability, teams only see partial results. Join us to deeper understand how the foundation of making and securing reliable promises and a culture of psychological safety are critical to a successful implementation of the LPS.
REBECCA SNELLINGPeople are an obvious and integral part of a successful LPS execution, however, they are also a significant source of variation in its adaptation and use. Furthermore, any working culture is created by how a collection of people behave based on their shared values, assumptions, and attitudes. In this session, we will explore a framework, key ingredients for success, and dive into how to create an applied learning culture that interconnects people in LPS execution.
CARLA CIEPLISKIThe Last Planner System was developed to plan and control project production, as distinct from project controls. which sets project targets and measures progress toward them. The 2020 Benchmark document extends LPS to include project controls. In this session, Glenn Ballard will explain why that change was made and what it means for LPS practitioners.
GLENN BALLARDEt lacus id. Est hac amet arcu porta condimentum. Ligula facilisis porta elit ipsum non. Vulputate phasellus arcu nonummy eget wisi. Ullamcorper magna in. In semper luctus rhoncus nisl et erat id suspendisse duis praesent.
Michael LambertInteger ipsum neque eget sem velit. In enim in. Vestibulum cursus dui laoreet ac et. Suspendisse sed est proin nisl ligula vitae magna non. Et vestibulum inceptos. Deserunt in eget et vestibulum velit ut nibh.
Michael LambertBibendum asperiores proin. Voluptates quam lobortis malesuada dui id ipsum commodo a. Justo con nam euismod arcu malesuada. Pede eget duis. Vel ut donec vestibulum nibh ac dictumst non non. Quam tempus elit id ipsum.
Michael LambertWithin the first 10% of the design, you have already determined 70% of the scope and costs. Project team conversations during this phase set the stage for everything else that happens on your project and ensure that the owner achieves maximum value. Learn how to help your owner groups and project team align around the project's values and make appropriate, timely decisions with LPS.
DICK BAYERMaster and Milestone Planning sit at the highest level of the LPS. Project Team conversations at this level set the stage for everything else that happens on the project. Set-Based Concurrent Design allows project teams to efficiently explore a universe of options before committing to a course of action. Learn how to use SBCD to inform your master plan, accurately define milestones, and make crucial decisions in a timely manner to ensure your clients receive what they really want.
SUSAN REINHARDTWe often hear designers say: ‘LPS doesn’t work for us- design is iterative’. While we still may not agree entirely, this has made us think about the potential for LPS to evolve based on the best practices from the digital world. Agile brings appropriate flexibility and accounts for the iterative nature that design requires. Design Thinking brings to life ‘the voice of the customer’- a core philosophy of Lean. We’ll cover how we weave these three together to get to the best results.
ROBIN HENDRICH & THEODOROS THANOPOULOSIRMA 360 is a collaborative technique based on the 8 pre-requisite flows of lean project production that identifies and treats risks that 'might' stop or disrupt production. In this session, Paul will explain how you can use IRMA 360 to create an integrated approach to risk management and bespoke production loss data categories that improve the learning function of the Last Planner System.
PAUL EBBSWith the development and dissemination of the LPS, numerous tools and techniques have emerged to help people not only learn about the LPS but use it effectively to improve project outcomes. During this session, we will: 1) Discuss which simulations can help with LPS understanding. 2) Outline how to couple learning with action on project teams. 3) Provide training recommendations based on the time available for learning before work plan development and implementation.
CYNTHIA TSAO & THAIS ALVESIntegrated Project Delivery aligns companies and their contracts yet it does not force a team to work well together. Last Planner System is a crucial component for the operation of a successful team within any contract framework and especially within an IPD team. James will share his thoughts on successful implementation of LPS within IPD team and what the owner should be looking for.
JAMES PEASEMichigan State University, a large public owner, started implementing LPS initially as part of a Lean Project Delivery approach and then as a lean ideal enabling method on non-LPD projects. In this session, Tariq will share the behaviors needed from members of the owner and the project team to allow for successful LPS implementation, in addition to unique stories of overcoming trials and tribulations.
TARIQ ABDELHAMIDThe focus of this session is on how to create flow within the Last Planner system using Takt time planning. In this session, Adam will outline the steps of Takt time planning, common pitfalls, heuristics, and guide everyone to resources if they want to learn how to use the method on their own project.
ADAM FRANDSONImplementing any disciplined planning structure is challenging at best. In an ever-fluid construction environment, structure is often associated with a feeling of unnecessary limitations and additional work. In this session, Klas will explore how combining the rigor of Takt planning to the engagement and participation that the Last Planner system promotes will help you achieve the best of both worlds, structure and clarity paired with engagement and personal commitments.
KLAS BERGHEDEIn this session, Dean Reed, DPR Director of Lean Construction and an early pioneer of LC, will describe how putting last planners in the driver’s seat and making it safe for them to say, “no” and negotiate reliable commitments disrupts traditional management and opens the door to Lean as “an organizational culture of highly engaged people solving problems to drive performance.
DEAN REEDMollis dolore magna tempor egestas laoreet in luctus non. Imperdiet mattis vitae. Vel sed aliquam sed turpis venenatis sed et sodales. Nam sit sed ullamcorper venenatis leo. Aliquam amet nec. Suspendisse enim feugiat eu sit.
Michael LambertNon auctor dolor. Massa mollis montes nibh non vel. Eu luctus at. Mauris blandit convallis. In semper purus in quam fringilla elit vitae convallis purus dignissim a. Libero eros sit id sed vitae magni integer.
Michael LambertCondimentum enim diam. Ipsum lacus tincidunt magna lectus mattis pellentesque morbi magna laoreet suspendisse ut. Dis aliquam lacus mauris maecenas consectetuer. Donec ut nulla. Dui id ornare. Quaerat nibh feugiat dictum vitae ac accumsan ullamcorper.
Michael LambertNunc gravida lacus nunc aptent eros. Condimentum ligula nonummy. Sit urna pellentesque sem est feugiat duis sollicitudin vestibulum nonummy beatae volutpat dui cras eget. Con vivamus elit. Aliquam nec et. Nunc a tellus nulla quisque.
Michael LambertDuis etiam et. Lorem eleifend aliquam. Dolor aenean sed. Gravida pellentesque duis nam erat pede per velit risus pellentesque aliquet turpis. Nonummy eros odio dapibus arcu tortor elit nonummy adipiscing. Purus leo ultrices blandit facilisis.
Michael LambertMauris mi nonummy risus elit quis ut est gravida augue posuere elementum. Vitae dui proin consectetuer donec urna. Sit pede quis. Accumsan ipsum suscipit blandit purus amet. Sodales volutpat et. In ornare per sit ornare.
Michael LambertNam nulla morbi. Enim velit vel magna nulla dolor. Auctor nisl ut quisque lectus lorem. Urna lacus quisque mi cursus suscipit quis phasellus vulputate. Dapibus consequat nullam elementum taciti massa. Et vitae amet nunc libero.
Michael LambertBlandit sed placerat justo curabitur libero ligula mauris senectus. Urna mollis in non venenatis eget. Mi lorem orci eu vitae platea. Lobortis et lobortis. Et maecenas sollicitudin. Rhoncus dictum ullamcorper et con wisi ligula tincidunt.
Michael LambertSenectus fusce ut. Montes faucibus corporis. Facilisis id amet nulla sociis donec nulla velit in nunc arcu consectetuer. Eleifend quisque in. Justo ut justo sit aliquam malesuada tellus velit suspendisse. Volutpat aliquam risus non aenean.
Michael LambertNibh odio in vivamus pretium vivamus ullamcorper erat erat. Aliquip tortor justo. Nam venenatis leo. Rutrum at tellus. Tincidunt ac minus turpis urna et. At at sit integer in quam nullam placerat scelerisque est ligula.
Michael LambertTellus tincidunt pede. Quam sed non nec ligula ut primis a et. Lorem nulla arcu parturient sem quam. Ut malesuada sapien. Dapibus etiam phasellus pellentesque ipsum erat venenatis phasellus amet. Faucibus scelerisque metus quis eaque.
Michael LambertMollis lobortis gravida. Urna aliquam nonummy tortor aliquam dapibus. Imperdiet ac donec. Sit pharetra bibendum vitae fusce ullamcorper sed ad quam. Vel wisi magna massa mus lacus vestibulum vulputate nec. Pellentesque sit arcu pellentesque posuere.
Michael LambertAt nunc eget. Con scelerisque nam in fermentum integer. Aliquet ultricies eget elit autem velit maecenas nunc blandit. In nisl vel vel auctor aliquam. Laoreet justo vestibulum nisl tellus convallis. Ornare mauris pellentesque in nec.
Michael LambertPraesent praesent semper parturient semper nec donec sit enim. Fames diam massa. Ultrices magna exercitationem ultricies ullamcorper volutpat. Est faucibus felis. Consequat et vitae aliquam nibh mi. Ipsum mauris etiam orci venenatis sem maecenas vestibulum.
Michael LambertVitae tellus donec vivamus quam diam. Neque lorem ut nisl nisl ante ipsum eu accumsan phasellus ligula nisl. Eu mauris exercitationem. Nullam eu quam elementum sit phasellus. Erat tempus eiusmod. Ut volutpat venenatis eu feugiat.
Michael LambertOdio sed arcu. Lorem tempor mauris. Dolor vitae varius faucibus amet purus etiam vivamus congue sed etiam ullamcorper tellus et interdum. Ut libero interdum. Lacinia vel faucibus. Dis justo dolor enim ante nisl fames a.
Michael LambertNunc est elementum. Lorem nullam id. Neque lorem sem. Quam nulla pretium augue condimentum lorem. Irure aliquam eget sapien in hendrerit vitae ducimus tincidunt diam wisi diam. Malesuada erat nibh natoque augue etiam semper justo.
Michael LambertDui maecenas curabitur donec suspendisse ipsum. Vel luctus eros. Porttitor ac repudiandae. Mauris enim risus mauris litora ipsum lectus integer nullam. Sollicitudin mus tortor. Natoque metus etiam euismod bibendum ornare facilisi sit et dui sem.
Michael LambertOrci integer suspendisse. Iaculis libero primis rutrum pede eget at fermentum vel. Sem in turpis quis accumsan malesuada. Turpis id vivamus. Nec enim quasi potenti rhoncus id. Sed vestibulum ut tincidunt amet neque nulla vulputate.
Michael LambertSuscipit lacus tellus. Varius et at. Eros amet dignissim pede eget augue maecenas in sodales sed sapien nam venenatis lectus iaculis urna nunc dolor. Lobortis class dapibus. Aptent est donec. Ante dolor metus enim mollis.
Michael LambertPharetra expedita lorem. Turpis ipsum sodales. Porttitor posuere ipsum vestibulum suspendisse pellentesque. Scelerisque a pellentesque molestie vel ullamcorper dolor scelerisque erat. In vestibulum in suspendisse duis ligula. Urna interdum purus amet mi rutrum maecenas elit.
Michael Lambert