days
hours
minutes
seconds
The Last Planner System (LPS) is a production planning system designed to improve predictability while maximizing efficiency and safety. The system was developed by Glenn Ballard and Greg Howell and has grown to become one of the cornerstones of Lean Construction. Simply put, LPS is exactly what its name suggests, a system that engages last planners—the people ultimately responsible for getting the work done—in the planning and efficient execution of a project.
The Last Planner System Conference will help you gain an in-depth insight into the practical application of the Last Planner System. You will learn about the different elements related to LPS and how they can improve communication, trust, transparency and reliability. You will also learn how LPS can help you meet project deadlines and cost targets with real-life examples and hands-on tips that you can start applying the next day.
The conference is hosted over 2 days, with over 27 industry experts and 18 sessions.
The Last Planner System Conference is suited for everyone working in the AEC industry from owners and project executives to trade partners and superintendents working at any stage of a project from design through construction. Here are some of the reasons for why you should attend:
The Last Planner System Conference will offer several great opportunities for sponsors and exhibitors. If you are interested in sponsoring or exhibiting at our upcoming conference, please review our sponsors kit or reach out to us directly.
Why Sponsor/Exhibit:
Learn from internationally renowned Lean Construction professionals
What are you doing better this year than you did last year in your implementation of LPS? We should view LPS as an open-ended system, with no determined limit or boundary to how well you can practice all the promises that comprise it. In this session, Tom challenges experienced and new LPS practitioners to continuously explore the possible ways to take their LPS practice to higher levels.
Tom RichertThe Last Planner System has several crucial conversations and practices that make it successful. At the heart of LPS is the need for skilled facilitation of the conversations. In this session, Andy will explore the best practices of facilitations for pull planning, daily huddles, weekly work plan, and retrospectives
Andy FultonAlthough LPS is the center of your project planning, it is much more than just scheduling. Last Planner gives us the framework for collaboration, for having the appropriate discussions, for creating stakeholder value. In this presentation, David will share his insights into the Last Planner System and explain why it is ,much more than scheduling which is what most people current use it for.
David MackayLPS has many steps, the last being the "will" step. This step includes all the key stakeholders visually displaying the promises they "will" keep for each task, for each day of the week. The promises are specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound (SMART). In this session, John will delve into the details around reliable promises and why they are crucial for project success.
John ZacharaProjects are complex adaptive systems that need to be managed as such. Most project control systems do not work because they are based on simple and static closed systems. In this session, Paulo will explore why projects are a network of commitments and how the project’s performance can be significantly improved through the use of reliable promises and the management of moods.
Paulo NapolitanoHow is the Last Planner System applied in projects across different companies? What are the main hurdles and how to overcome them? How to get buy-in from management and workers out in the field? How has LPS improved the way we build? This and more will be discussed in the superintendent panel, with representatives from Henson Robinson, Hensel Phelps, Robins & Morton & Ledcor.
Spencer Easton, Sam Sinclair, Chris Vine, Jared Wilson, Mike BurleyThe Last Planner System is a system for project production that promotes the creation of a predictable workflow among various parties so that it achieves reliable results. The LPS® allows potential hurdles to be found and addressed before they slow down the flow. In this session, a case study will be presented to illustrate the significance of collaboration in effectively shielding production. The study will highlight an instance where project key stakeholders joined forces to create an environment where issues could be promptly discussed and resolved, thereby preventing disruptions in the field. The emphasis will be placed on the collective mindset of individuals coming together to solve problems and protect production, rather than on the use of specific tools or technology. By doing so, this case brings a valuable reminder of the power of collaboration in achieving optimal project outcomes.
Patricia Tillmann & Stuart EckbladWhen using the LPS, we thrive for reliability through a network of commitment within our team. Instead of assuming that communication and team members speaking up simply "happen," our research shows that these aspects often require intentional effort. Join us for an in-depth exploration of team dynamics, providing insights that can enhance your understanding of your own team.
Sulyn GomezRespect for people is a fundamental pillar of lean construction. Many teams focus on a particular lean method or tool without starting with respect first. This can lead to short term wins and no long term gains over time. In this presentation, Sean will share stories and examples of what respect for people means to him. The goal is for you to anchor your lean implementation on respect and understand that the human condition is vital for any continuous improvement success.
Sean GraystoneSome people new to Integrated Project Delivery (IPD) believe that the contracting process is wasting a lot of precious time, But in reality, the contracting process should be a key step in aligning the owner and the IPD team. In this session, Howard will map a workflow that leads to deeper understanding and commitment, as well as a better agreement.
Howard AshcraftEt lacus id. Est hac amet arcu porta condimentum. Ligula facilisis porta elit ipsum non. Vulputate phasellus arcu nonummy eget wisi. Ullamcorper magna in. In semper luctus rhoncus nisl et erat id suspendisse duis praesent.
Michael LambertInteger ipsum neque eget sem velit. In enim in. Vestibulum cursus dui laoreet ac et. Suspendisse sed est proin nisl ligula vitae magna non. Et vestibulum inceptos. Deserunt in eget et vestibulum velit ut nibh.
Michael LambertBibendum asperiores proin. Voluptates quam lobortis malesuada dui id ipsum commodo a. Justo con nam euismod arcu malesuada. Pede eget duis. Vel ut donec vestibulum nibh ac dictumst non non. Quam tempus elit id ipsum.
Michael LambertMaking-do as a waste refers to a situation where a task is started without all its standard inputs, or the execution of a task is continued although the availability of at least one standard input has ceased. Making-do as a waste refers to a situation where a task is started without all its standard inputs, or the execution of a task is continued although the availability of at least one standard input has ceased. Glenn will explore how Make-do affects productivity, why it is detrimental, and how to combat it.
Glenn BallardMaster planning is about making strategic choices in how you approach a project overall within the boundaries and constraints you face. In this session, Colin will share and give examples of the steps of Master planning from identifying boundaries and constraints to documenting the decision. He will also discuss how Master planning should be agile where options and decisions should be revisited to ensure they are delivering the best value.
Colin MilbergThe Parade of Trades® simulation is an important foundational learning block for anyone on the Lean Construction journey. Inspired by the book “The Goal” in the early 1990s, Greg Howell developed the simulation to help project teams understand the importance of reliability in work plan execution and the value of using the LPS to make transparent repetitive work sequences in on-site installation activities. In this session, Cynthia will share how the simulation helps players understand the foundations of LPS and Takt
Cynthia TsaoHow is the Last Planner System applied in projects across different companies? What are the main hurdles and how to overcome them? How to get buy-in from management and workers out in the field? How has LPS improved the way we build? This and more will be discussed in the project managers panel, with representatives from CRB, IPS and Ledcor.
Heather Ormonde, Tammy McConaughy, George Hunt, Dominic Desmarais, Lisa GibsonTakt and the Last Planner System work synergistically to improve project outcomes. In this session, Brian, Lindsay, and Spencer will share the benefits of using Takt with the Last Planner System from a superintendent and scheduler perspective. They will highlight examples and projects that have benefited from utilizing both methods.
Brian Boe, Lindsay Cable, & Spencer EastonThough the Last Planner System has been well-established for more than a decade, many people are surprised to learn that it is just as valuable and effective during design as during construction. In this session, Kurt will showcase multiple projects that used LPS during the design phase, comparing and contrasting what each team found most valuable. If you are using—or want to use—Last Planner starting in the design/Preconstruction phase, you are sure to pick up some tips you can use from this session. .
Kurt NeubekA Lean Integrated Project Delivery (IPD) project is very different from a traditional Design-Bid-Build (DBB) project. Many owners and teams have a hard time navigating the IPD process because it is so different from their prior experience. In this session, Carla will go through the key events that need to happen in the first 6 months of a Lean IPD project to set it up for success.
Carla CiepliskiThe current project delivery approach leads to more failures than successes. In this session, Todd will explain why most projects are set up to fail. The way that management administers projects, creates schedules and procures are not aligned with the ideas from Operation Science. Concepts such as work in progress (WIP), cycle time, lead time, and resource allocation are not considered in the current paradigm. Using Operation Science, we are able to model, simulate, optimize, and control project outcomes.
Todd ZabelleMollis dolore magna tempor egestas laoreet in luctus non. Imperdiet mattis vitae. Vel sed aliquam sed turpis venenatis sed et sodales. Nam sit sed ullamcorper venenatis leo. Aliquam amet nec. Suspendisse enim feugiat eu sit.
Michael LambertNon auctor dolor. Massa mollis montes nibh non vel. Eu luctus at. Mauris blandit convallis. In semper purus in quam fringilla elit vitae convallis purus dignissim a. Libero eros sit id sed vitae magni integer.
Michael LambertCondimentum enim diam. Ipsum lacus tincidunt magna lectus mattis pellentesque morbi magna laoreet suspendisse ut. Dis aliquam lacus mauris maecenas consectetuer. Donec ut nulla. Dui id ornare. Quaerat nibh feugiat dictum vitae ac accumsan ullamcorper.
Michael LambertNunc gravida lacus nunc aptent eros. Condimentum ligula nonummy. Sit urna pellentesque sem est feugiat duis sollicitudin vestibulum nonummy beatae volutpat dui cras eget. Con vivamus elit. Aliquam nec et. Nunc a tellus nulla quisque.
Michael LambertDuis etiam et. Lorem eleifend aliquam. Dolor aenean sed. Gravida pellentesque duis nam erat pede per velit risus pellentesque aliquet turpis. Nonummy eros odio dapibus arcu tortor elit nonummy adipiscing. Purus leo ultrices blandit facilisis.
Michael LambertMauris mi nonummy risus elit quis ut est gravida augue posuere elementum. Vitae dui proin consectetuer donec urna. Sit pede quis. Accumsan ipsum suscipit blandit purus amet. Sodales volutpat et. In ornare per sit ornare.
Michael LambertNam nulla morbi. Enim velit vel magna nulla dolor. Auctor nisl ut quisque lectus lorem. Urna lacus quisque mi cursus suscipit quis phasellus vulputate. Dapibus consequat nullam elementum taciti massa. Et vitae amet nunc libero.
Michael LambertBlandit sed placerat justo curabitur libero ligula mauris senectus. Urna mollis in non venenatis eget. Mi lorem orci eu vitae platea. Lobortis et lobortis. Et maecenas sollicitudin. Rhoncus dictum ullamcorper et con wisi ligula tincidunt.
Michael LambertSenectus fusce ut. Montes faucibus corporis. Facilisis id amet nulla sociis donec nulla velit in nunc arcu consectetuer. Eleifend quisque in. Justo ut justo sit aliquam malesuada tellus velit suspendisse. Volutpat aliquam risus non aenean.
Michael LambertNibh odio in vivamus pretium vivamus ullamcorper erat erat. Aliquip tortor justo. Nam venenatis leo. Rutrum at tellus. Tincidunt ac minus turpis urna et. At at sit integer in quam nullam placerat scelerisque est ligula.
Michael LambertTellus tincidunt pede. Quam sed non nec ligula ut primis a et. Lorem nulla arcu parturient sem quam. Ut malesuada sapien. Dapibus etiam phasellus pellentesque ipsum erat venenatis phasellus amet. Faucibus scelerisque metus quis eaque.
Michael LambertMollis lobortis gravida. Urna aliquam nonummy tortor aliquam dapibus. Imperdiet ac donec. Sit pharetra bibendum vitae fusce ullamcorper sed ad quam. Vel wisi magna massa mus lacus vestibulum vulputate nec. Pellentesque sit arcu pellentesque posuere.
Michael LambertAt nunc eget. Con scelerisque nam in fermentum integer. Aliquet ultricies eget elit autem velit maecenas nunc blandit. In nisl vel vel auctor aliquam. Laoreet justo vestibulum nisl tellus convallis. Ornare mauris pellentesque in nec.
Michael LambertPraesent praesent semper parturient semper nec donec sit enim. Fames diam massa. Ultrices magna exercitationem ultricies ullamcorper volutpat. Est faucibus felis. Consequat et vitae aliquam nibh mi. Ipsum mauris etiam orci venenatis sem maecenas vestibulum.
Michael LambertVitae tellus donec vivamus quam diam. Neque lorem ut nisl nisl ante ipsum eu accumsan phasellus ligula nisl. Eu mauris exercitationem. Nullam eu quam elementum sit phasellus. Erat tempus eiusmod. Ut volutpat venenatis eu feugiat.
Michael LambertOdio sed arcu. Lorem tempor mauris. Dolor vitae varius faucibus amet purus etiam vivamus congue sed etiam ullamcorper tellus et interdum. Ut libero interdum. Lacinia vel faucibus. Dis justo dolor enim ante nisl fames a.
Michael LambertNunc est elementum. Lorem nullam id. Neque lorem sem. Quam nulla pretium augue condimentum lorem. Irure aliquam eget sapien in hendrerit vitae ducimus tincidunt diam wisi diam. Malesuada erat nibh natoque augue etiam semper justo.
Michael LambertDui maecenas curabitur donec suspendisse ipsum. Vel luctus eros. Porttitor ac repudiandae. Mauris enim risus mauris litora ipsum lectus integer nullam. Sollicitudin mus tortor. Natoque metus etiam euismod bibendum ornare facilisi sit et dui sem.
Michael LambertOrci integer suspendisse. Iaculis libero primis rutrum pede eget at fermentum vel. Sem in turpis quis accumsan malesuada. Turpis id vivamus. Nec enim quasi potenti rhoncus id. Sed vestibulum ut tincidunt amet neque nulla vulputate.
Michael LambertSuscipit lacus tellus. Varius et at. Eros amet dignissim pede eget augue maecenas in sodales sed sapien nam venenatis lectus iaculis urna nunc dolor. Lobortis class dapibus. Aptent est donec. Ante dolor metus enim mollis.
Michael LambertPharetra expedita lorem. Turpis ipsum sodales. Porttitor posuere ipsum vestibulum suspendisse pellentesque. Scelerisque a pellentesque molestie vel ullamcorper dolor scelerisque erat. In vestibulum in suspendisse duis ligula. Urna interdum purus amet mi rutrum maecenas elit.
Michael Lambert